A still from CCTV footage of Michael Brown strong-arming a store-owner just before the shooting incident.
These lies and disinformation are disseminated to the African-American community, in the expectation—and even the deliberate hope—that that community will then blame European Americans, riot, and then fulfill the stereotype so that the same media can then endlessly discuss “racism” in America.
In a subset of European Americans, such lies cause demoralization and division among, even causing a significant sector of European Americans to exhibit self-hatred.
At the same time, this never-ending cycle of lies, incitement and violence serves as a perfect “cover” for the media to divert attention away from the only real racism in America—that of Jewish Supremacism against everyone else.
It must be stated clearly, that real racism, which is defined by hatred, harm, exploitation, oppression or even destruction of any race by any other race… is truly one of the greatest evils plaguing mankind.
Such must be unequivocally condemned as I do here. But, the problem is that the media is controlled by the ultimate racists of all, the Jewish tribalists who dominate because of their racist tribalism, but who want to brand all their competitors for power as “racists.”
The facts of the Ferguson case are clear: as unanimously decided by the grand jury, which consisted of nine European-Americans and three African-Americans, the media’s version of events has been proven to be a complete lie from start to finish.
The media propagated the myth that Michael Brown was an innocent “black teen” who was maliciously gunned down by a “racist” white policeman.
The Grand Jury, having had access to all the facts, and, as explained by the prosecutor before the grand jury, Robert McCulloch, the indictment against the European-American policeman had been rejected because the evidence, both physical and eyewitness, supported his case that he had acted in self-defense.
McCulloch added pointed criticism of the media that drove the case in the first place, ripping the “insatiable appetite” of social media and “non-stop rumors” driven by it.
The initial accounts pushed by social media, McCulloch said, were “
filled with speculation and little, if any, solid or accurate evidence.”
But he saved his harshest criticism for the media machine itself: “
The most significant challenge encountered in this investigation has been the 24-hour news cycle and its insatiable appetite for something, for anything, to talk about, followed closely behind with the non-stop rumors on social media.”
McCulloch finished by stating that evidence mattered, and that no one’s life should be decided based on “public outcry or for political expediency.”
This was exactly what the same media did with the Trayvon Martin shooting, and numerous other incidents—focus on rumors, half-truths and outright lies, with the deliberate intention of inciting African-Americans against European-Americans.
Other examples of this sort of deliberately dishonest tactic are legion. For example, American Conservative writer Ron Unz, in his study The Myth of American Meritocracy, pointed out the case of a black worker, Connecticut truck driver Omar Thornton, who deliberately targeted whites for a mass murder spree at his place of employment.
Unz writes about how the media was not at all concerned with this explicitly racist mass murder of whites. The media was only interested in justifying the racist mass murder by suggesting the victims were possibly racists, which, in their eyes, would somehow “justify” the murders.
After black Connecticut truck driver Omar Thornton massacred 9 of his co-workers boasting that he was targeting whites, and saying that he wished he could kill more of them, the media focused considerable attention on whether they had been innocent victims or “racists” as Thornton had alleged.”
Not a single headline about this massive racially-motivated killer headlined the case as a “
Black man Boasts of murdering White People.”
But, as can so often seen to be the case—as shown by the Michael Brown case once again, the media is quick to always make claims along the line of “
white racist murders black” etc.
Even when, as has now happened, all the factual evidence clearly shows that Brown was the aggressor, the Jewish Supremacist controlled media will go out of its way to propagate the “white guilt” myth.
Take for example the article by Vox editor, Ezra Klein, in that journal of November 26. Titled “Officer Darren Wilson’s story is unbelievable. Literally,” the Jewish Supremacist journalist Klein (a veteran writer for The Washington Post, Bloomberg News and MSNBC) dismissed all the evidence before the Grand Jury as “simply bizarre” and “difficult to believe.”
What Klein—who was named one of the 50 most powerful people in Washington, D.C., by GQ magazine in 2011—actually means is that the facts, as accepted by the Grand Jury, do not show “white guilt” and therefore must be wrong.
This is the dominating theme of the mass media’s coverage of the Ferguson case—and all other similar examples.
The Racist, Deceptive Headlines of the Zio Media
NBC Anchor, Brian Williams, shortly before the Ferguson grand jury decision announced:
“We are anxiously awaiting the decision of the grand jury in the case of a white policeman’s shooting and killing an unarmed black teen.”
The officer Brian Williams was referring to was Darren Wilson, and in his years of tenure in the Ferguson police department there was never an allegation of any kind of racism against him, and not a single disciplinary mark against him. Never an allegation by any of the black people in the district in which he worked of any kind of racism or inappropriate behavior in enforcing the law.
The most prominent phrase the headlines of the case in America’s controlled media is: “
White cop shoots and kills an unarmed black teen.”
In America huge numbers of assaults, rapes, or murders by black predators are perpetrated on completely innocent European American men and women.
Although there are tens of thousands of such cases, have you ever seen a single headline reading: “Black man Murders White Man and Woman.”
Think for a second. Why does the media not write the headlines that way?
Why, of course, to write the headline that way would be considered racist.
So why is using racial labeling “white” okay when used negatively against whites?
Mentioning the race of crime perpetrators and victims is almost never done in the American media, at least when the victims are white.
The Los Angeles Times for instance issued an official statement in 2007 that the standard media practice in America is to censors the race of minority crime perpetrators.
Here is the statement:
“
Racial information was once routinely included in news stories about crimes, but in recent decades, newspapers and other media outlets stopped mentioning suspects’ or victims’ race or ethnicity because of public criticism. Newspapers came to embrace the idea that such information is irrelevant to the reporting of crimes, and may unfairly stigmatize racial groups.” (June 6, 2007 LA Times official statement)
In fact the New York Times and leading newspapers of America have a policy of not identifying the race of the perpetrator and his victim, not even in the story itself and certainly never in the headline about it.
That would be “racist.”
So why is mentioning the race of a shooter when a black person is shot, even if it is likely done in self-defense after being attacked, perfectly okay?
Why is it not permissible when the victim is white or even of a different race.
A perfect example is the mass gang rape of a Mexican girl in Texas.
Racial facts of a horrific crime covered up by the New York Times
Of course, the queen of American journalism is the Jewish owned and controlled NY Times. It shows the way for other papers all over America.
In March of 2011, 28 black males were sought in the gang rape of an 11 year old Mexican girl in Cleveland, Texas. The sexual attacks were actually filmed on some of the rapists’ cell phones.
Phillip Corbett , associate manager of the New York Times confessed to censoring the fact the race of the 18 men charged and the 10 more ( a total of 28 black males) who were sought for the rape of an eleven year old Mexican girl.
Black Panther Quanell X held a rally blaming the arrests on white racism and blamed the 11 year girl for her own rape.
The NY Times also labelled the 100 blacks at the rally as “Texans.”
Be honest, when you hear the moniker Texans, don’t you automatically think of a Clint Eastwood type white guy with cowboy boots. Take a look, do these accused rapists look to you like Clint Eastwood. Do they look like what you think of when you hear the word “Texan?”
So, their argument is clear:
If a black man is the perpetrator of a horrific crime, according to the NY Times identifying his race and making a point of it is “racist” because it casts aspersions on a whole group.
However, mentioning the race of the perpetrator and the victim is perfectly okay if it is a white perpetrator and black victim, even if there is evidence that the white was acting completely in self-defense.
So how is this not racist?
Let’s look at the headline again:
“White cop shoots and kills unarmed black teen.”
Of course the image from that headline is that a white cop just walks up to an unarmed black teen and shoots him to death for no reason.
Maybe because he is black?
In truth, the facts from the beginning were that the dead black teen had just committed a strong arm robbery and was being sought. In truth, from the beginning we knew that the officer had suffered injuries and claimed that he was attacked by the suspect who was trying to get the officer’s gun.
A truly fair, non-racist headline would have read:
“Suspected robbery suspect shot in struggle with police officer.”
If you reported the facts as the evidence strongly suggested you could headline: “Robbery suspect shot in possible struggle with police officer.”
So, the real racism in this case clear. It is racism and unbridled hatred against European Americans.
And understand clearly that this hatred is not coming from the black or even from the white liberal community. It is coming from the real rulers of America: the ultra-racist supremacists who control the media, finance and politics of the United States of America.
It the masters of the media who put the words into the mouth of Brian Williams of CBS.
It is the Jewish masters of media who want to allege “white privilege” in America whereas the real privilege, the overwhelming privilege in media, finance, academia and government is Jewish privilege, all created by Jewish tribalism and racism that led to their takeover of the key levers of power in society.
I have shown again and again how European Americans who are over 60 percent of the American population are only 20 percent of Harvard and the elite universities of the united States even though they are the highest qualified students. Jews on the other hand are only 2 percent of the population and outnumber whites with 35 percent of the Ivy League. How is it “white privilege” when whites are massively discriminated against by Jews.
The way that Jewish racist tribalists have taken over America is by demonizing and dividing European Americans. Also, they have to foment other racial groups in America to hatred and anger against European Americans when the truth is that the media degeneration of both black and white teens kills tens of thousands more teenagers of all races than shot by police officers.
Media glorification of violence, drugs, alcohol and sexual abuse kills far more people black and white than deaths cause by those who are forced defend themselves from violent and crazed attackers.
Lies, Lies and More Lies of the Zio Media
The Daily Kos ran a story titled “How Often are Unarmed Black Men Shot Down By Police?”
It gave the typical racist argument trying to prove racist white actions of police against black people.
Here is the quotation in question.
This summer ColorLines and The Chicago Reporter
conducted a joint national investigation of fatal police shootings in America’s 10 largest cities, each of which had more than 1 million people in 2000. Several striking findings emerged.
To begin, African Americans were overrepresented among police shooting victims in every city the publications investigated.
The contrast was particularly noticeable in New York, San Diego and Las Vegas. In each of these cities, the percentage of black people killed by police was at least double that of their share of the city’s total population.
So, what does the study show specifically?
1) In every city African Americans were more likely to be shot by police than European Americans.
2) The proportion of black shooting victims were especially high in New York, San Diego and Las Vegas. There, blacks were killed by police at least double than their percentage share of the city’s total population.
The article forgets to give the reader one vital fact:
On a per capita basis in the United States, blacks are six times more likely to commit violent crimes than whites.
But, in the three cities that had the most disproportionate number of blacks shot in comparison with their population percentage, such shootings were only double their percentage of population.
In fact, according to National Crime Statistics compiled by the U.S. Justice Department under the oversight of black activist Eric Holder, blacks commit at least 6 times more violent crime per capita than do whites.
It makes sense to think that police would be far more likely to shoot someone committing a violent crime or sought for one. So if blacks are at least six times more likely to commit violent crimes than whites are, yet they are shot at only twice their proportion.
The facts show that white criminal suspects are much more likely to be shot by police per capita than are black criminal suspects!
Take a look at the Mother Jones’ article which stupidly reveals the own blind anti-white racism in their own charts and stats.
The six columns in the chart shown above for 2012 show the following:
1) Blacks are about 22 percent of the population of NY, whites are over 32 percent of the population.
2) It shows that although blacks are under 25 percent of the population they are almost 70 percent of those arrested for firearms violations.
3) It leaves out the vastly higher violent crime rate, but does show that blacks totaled 771 criminal shooting suspects, which is over 70 percent of those identified as criminal shooting suspects!
4) It shows that only 41 of these shooting suspects were fired upon by the police.
4a) Yet, even though blacks were over 70 percent of the shooting suspects, there were less than 50 percent of the suspects fired upon by the police.
4b) Even more amazingly, whites, who only about three percent of the shooting suspects, were 15 percent of those fired upon by police.
5) It shows that only 28 suspects were struck by police gunfire.
5a) Whites, only three percent of shooting suspects were over 20 percent of the ones struck by police gunfire.
5b) Blacks who were over 70 percent of the identified shooting suspects were only 45 percent of those struck by Police gunfire.
6) This column shows that of the shooting suspects who actually fired at the police were all either black or Hispanic and not one white had fired at the police.
ll this is without any doubt a deliberate policy. For example, consider the following list of murders which have occurred—all verifiable by simple internet searches—which have taken place over the past few months:
7/18-Jimmie Norman, white male murdered by black male. No national news.
7/18-Terry Taylor, white male murdered by black male. No national news.
7/17-Cindy Raygoza, white female murdered by black male. No national news.
7/11-Luis Aguilar, 91 year old Hispanic male murdered by black male. No national news.
7/10-Brittany Simpson, white female murdered by black male. No national news.
7/6-Sarah Goode, white female murdered by black male. No national news.
7/6-Jeffrey Westerfield, white male murdered by black male. No national news.
7/5-Perry Renn, white male murdered by black male. No national news.
7/3-Laurey Kennedy, white female still in coma from beating by black male. No national news
7/3-Eric Mollet, white male murdered by black male. No national news.
7/2-Rupert Anderson, white male murdered by black male. No national news.
7/2-Jennifer Kingeter, white female murdered by black male. No national news.
6/30-Jim Brennan, white male, murdered by black male. No national news.
6/29-Shephard, white male, murdered by black male. No national news.
6/27-Shirley Barone, white female, murdered by black male. No national news.
6/27-Penelope Spencer, white female, murdered by black male. No national news.
6/27-Inga Evans, white female, murdered by black male. No national news.
6/26-Jake Rameau, white male, murdered by black male. No national news.
6/25-Gina Burger, white female, murdered by black male. No national news.
6/24- Dasher, white male, murdered by black male. No national news.
6/22-Jonathan Price, white male, murdered by black male. No national news.
6/20-Whitmore, white male, murdered by black male. No national news.
6/18-John Yingling, white male, murdered by black male. No national news.
6/17-Allyn Reeves, white male, murdered by black male. No national news.
6/15-Michael Beaver, white male, murdered by black male. No national news.
6/11-Angela Cook, white female, murdered by black male. No national news.
6/11-Hall, white male, murdered by black male. No national news.
6/7-Harry Briggs, white male, murdered by black male. No national news.
6/5-Laura Bachman, white female, murdered by black male. No national news.
6/2-Robert Mohler, white male, murdered by black male. No national news.
The controlled media has deliberately chosen not to give any national prominence to these murders, even though there is an obvious racial angle to them.
Furthermore, the vast majority of African-American shooting deaths are committed by other African-Americans—yet the same media ignores this fact, and instead focuses only on the relatively few white-on-black incidents—and then goes on to lie and deceive the general public, and the African-American community in particular—over those incidents.
This cannot be a “mistake.” Time and time again, the Jewish Supremacist controlled media has sought out incidents upon which to focus and incite everybody—from all communities.
Meanwhile the real issues—such as the Jewish Supremacist control of America’s foreign policy, the Jewish Supremacist control of the political process in America, and the Jewish Supremacist control of the financial systems—goes unreported.
The media would rather focus on one shooting of a violent individual in Ferguson, Mo, than the deaths by bombing and phosphorus of thousands of Palestinian children by Israel in Gaza.
The media would rather focus on spreading lies about European-American policemen than draw attention to the fact that Jewish-Israeli billionaires are busy buying the candidates for the 2016 presidential elections.
The media would rather spread the lie that a large, 200 lb. grown man was a “teen” who was shot “with his hands up in the air” than point out that the Israeli cabinet has just approved a “Jews-only” bill which will soon be submitted to the Israeli parliament for approval—a bill which is the diametric opposite of what the Jewish lobby—and the media—demands for America and all other non-Jewish nations.
The real evidence is clear: the true racists are the manipulators of facts in the mass media—which is almost completely controlled by Jewish Supremacists.
The real racism in America is Jewish racism, and the racism that these tribalists incite between non-Jews so they can continue to divide and conquer—and oppress and exploit us all.
Until this Jewish tribalist power over is broken, there cannot be real justice in America for European Americans or African Americans.
Prvotno napisano od Grunf
mi smo išli korektno prema njima, pa smo dobili šta, isti tretman kao i prema srbima čak su i gori prema nama jer federaciju smatraju privatnom prčijom koju pošto poto moraju obranit od "ustaša". jedva čekam da vidim hoće li biti šta sarajlija na tekmi protiv hajduka u hercegovini, jedva čekam, ajde talibani skupite se vi ćete udarat po hrvatima, e nećete barem ne da ne dobijete pu nosu i ušima. tu u hr imaju zvijezdani status, pogledajte samo ove njihove ušminkane zvijezdie od tarika filipovića pa do hadžiesenbegovića, svima im kao smeta hrvatska ali rado dolaze u nju kao i Srbi, to je ta tipična balkanska zloba dobro su mi oni poznati a ja takvo ponašanje ne trpim. što se mene tiče, samo rat s njima dolazi u obzir, ovo vezanje zastave i kvazi savezništvo nikad neće dobro završit, sama činjenica da oni ne prihvaćaju herceg bosnu kod mene automatski idu na crnu listu. očito je da ne žele gradit nikakve normalne odnose, nego da im Hrvati služe za unutarnje bosansko raskusuravanje s srbima, kojima ne mogu realno skinut ni vlas s glave u bilo kakvom sukobu, Srbi će ih prebit da ne znaju kako se zovu. a boga mi i Hrvati, idući puta nećemo samo pasivno promatrat već ćemo izvršit agresiju na bosnu i potjerat ih iz istočnog mostra te okupirat dobar dio središnje bosne, pa neka drug nobilo i mesić odu u UN pričat o agresiji i naravno neka plate ratnu odštetu BiH iz svog vlastitog džepa to bi ima javno reko kad su već tako prijateljski nastrojeni prema bošnjacima, neka fino isprazne svoje bankovne račune i neka plate seljačiji i sirotinji, neće im biti problem jer se sami zalažu za plaćanje ratne odštete BiH. ajde ajde, igrat ćemo i mi podlo i prljavo, nije da se ne može kad se hoće, iskreno da smo prema njiam okrenuli pristup ranije odavno bi riješili sve probleme u bosni koji tište naš narod, ali mi nikad nećemo radikalno da presiječemo i njihova i srpska sranja, kao ni ova jugoslavenska komunistička od domaćih idiota koji još slave titu i partizane. lako što salve, nego je to ta politika koketiranja s muslimanima i srbima, naravno na štetu hrvata ne u bosni već i u hrvatskoj. ali to će se sve promjenit, puno prije nego što se dotični nadaju.
Pravila pisanja poruke
Odgovori s citatom
