Pogledaj Full Version : Zašto patrijarhat? Zato.

02-06-2015, 17:21
Za sve mangine i femtardkinje (Sanja Sarnavka, Ankica Čakardić, Nadežda Čačinović, Vedrana Rudan, Gordana Cerjan – Letica, Rada Borić, Dafinka Večerina) evo društvenog eksperimenta koji dokazuje zašto patrijarhat a ne neki drugi napredniji oblik društvene zajednice.


This Accidental Experiment Shows The Superiority Of Patriarchy

Patriarchy has been extremely successful, despite its recent vilification. Most cultures worldwide are patriarchal – to find examples of successful matriarchal societies you either have to turn to ancient history, remote outskirts of the world or feminist fiction. However, this hasn’t stopped the feminist collective from queefing out books and even a hashtag hailing the end of patriarchy in a textbook example of incestuous amplification.

What patriarchy, after its apparent downfall, will be replaced with remains to be seen. Hamsterizations aside, there is surprisingly little data available about what life would be like in a society made up of only men or only women. An enterprising social scientist might want to perform an experiment where groups of men and groups of women are left to their own devices, having to work together to survive against the elements and build a civilization from scratch. However, this scientist would have a very hard time convincing ethical review boards that the inevitable suffering of his participants would weight up against the value of the data.

Luckily, reality television is not bound by ethical constraints and once in a while, in its never ending quest for viewer ratings, reality TV accidentally performs a very interesting experiment that social scientists would never be allowed to do.

Quite a few years ago, I had the pleasure of watching the Dutch version of Survivor (Expeditie Robinson) with my feminist roommate. That particular season would have two islands, one populated by men and one populated by women. My roommate had been promoting that particular series to me and the other students in the house for weeks because it would show us, according to her, what a society run by women – free from the evils of patriarchy – would be like.

And it did. Oh it did.

Here is what happened: initially both groups were dropped on their respective islands, given some supplies to get started and left to fend for themselves. In both groups there was some initial squabbling as people tried to figure out a local hierarchy. The men pretty much did whatever they felt was necessary – there was no leader giving orders. Men who felt like hunting, foraging or fishing did so. Another guy decided he was fed up with sitting on sand and started making benches. Others built a hut that gradually grew and evolved. Another guy cooked every night. Within days a neat little civilization was thriving, each day being slightly more prosperous than the previous one.


The women settled into a routine as well. The hung up a clothesline to dry their towels, then proceeded to sunbathe and squabble. Because unlike men, women were unable to do anything without consensus of the whole group. And because it was a group of at least a dozen women, consensus was never reached. During the next few episodes, the women ate all their initial supplies, got drenched by tropical storms several times, were eaten alive by sand fleas and were generally miserable. The men on the other hand, were quite content. There were disagreements of course, but they were generally resolved.

Eventually, the people running the program decided something had to change. In order to help the women out, three men would be selected to go to their island. In return, three women would take their place at the men’s island. The look on my feminist roommates face during this episode was priceless.


Initially, the three men selected for the women’s island were ecstatic, for obvious reason. But then they arrived at the island and were greeted by the women.

‘Where is your hut?’, they asked.

‘We have no hut’

‘Where are your supplies?’ they asked, dismayed

‘We ate all the rice’


And so on. The three men ended up working like dogs, using all the skills developed by trial and error in their first few weeks – building a hut, fish, trying to get the women to forage. The women continued to bitch and sunbathe. The three women who were sent to the men’s island were delighted – food, shelter and plenty of male attention was freely available. They too continued to sunbathe.

And that my friends, is what patriarchy is. My former roommate, unsurprisingly, is no longer a feminist.

Now this might all be a fluke, a white raven, an exceptional case not representative of society as whole. But that particular season of Dutch Survivor is not unique. CBS broadcast several Survivor seasons in the US, where men and women started off in separate groups. In most cases (the Amazon and One World), the result was the same. The men quickly got their act together, getting access to food, fire and shelter while the women spent a lot of time and energy on petty little squabbles, eating their meager supplies, getting drenched in storms and generally being pathetic. The opposite situation, where men didn’t get their act together while women quickly built a functional micro society, has not yet been observed outside of feminist fiction, and it probably never will.

Bez obzira na stvarnost, kulturni marksisti ne odustaju dok u potpunosti ne rasture SAD zbog svojih fiks ideja, valjda je tako suđeno, sve velike civilizacije se unište iznutra, na redu je američka vojska i to nitko drugi nego Američki Rendžeri, jer muško i žensko su društveni konstrukti, sve što može muškarac može i žena i bolje od njega:


All Female Ranger Candidates Fail, Calls to Change Standard

http://s16.postimg.org/5udv1tbzp/thuy1_618x487.jpg (http://postimage.org/)
“Power Rangers was real… in my mind.” -Women

The Army has announced that all the women who had attempted to graduate from Ranger School have failed to meet the standards. They are, of course, claiming that standards must be lowered to cover their physical inadequacy.

Feminists are the Blacks of the White race – the more you oblige them, the more they demand, and there is no end to it. They are incapable of competing with men, just as Blacks are incapable of competing with Whites, and so they cry foul if you refuse to change the rules to make up for their biological deficiency.

Christian Science Monitor (http://news.yahoo.com/8-women-fail-ranger-school-rangers-standards-change-214600870.html):

Ranger School, which grooms the Army’s most elite special operations fighting force, opened its doors to women for the first time this year. Eight of the 20 women who originally entered the school’s first co-ed class were allowed to recycle through the program after they fell out in their first go-round. The Friday announcement will confirm that this happened again.

The Rangers are the best of the best, and being a Ranger means passing a physical test that pushes body and mind to the breaking point. If women can’t do it, the argument goes, then they shouldn’t be Rangers.

But there is another opinion quietly being voiced as well: that Ranger School is more akin to a rite of passage – an opportunity for men to “thump their chest,” as one Ranger puts it – than a realistic preparation for leading in war. That women can actually make Ranger units more effective. And that the standards that keep them out are outdated.

It is an opinion, perhaps surprisingly, that comes from two current Rangers.

This is the sort of suggestion that has long been guaranteed to create a robust outcry in many soldierly quarters – one that involves, put most politely, the charge that this would amount to lowering standards in order to meet some goal born of political correctness.

It isn’t a way of thinking likely to gain great traction anytime soon. Gen. Raymond Odierno, the Army’s top officer, made this clear during a breakfast with reporters Thursday. While praising the performance of the women at the Ranger School, he added: “I’m actually fairly adamant about not changing the physical standards.”

But a discussion is percolating.

Secretary of the Navy Ray Mabus told the Navy Times this week that once women start attending SEAL training, it would make sense to examine the standards. “First, we’re going to make sure there are standards. Second, that they are gender-neutral, and third, that they have something to do with the job,” he said.

It is increasingly men who are doing the talking about standards because, they say, they’ve trained in the schools, served in the field, and they believe it’s the right thing to do.

“I think it’ll be contentious, but I think it’s equitable and sensible to ask the question about what are the [Ranger School] standards that are only related to the fact that only men have ever done it,” says retired Lt. Gen. David Barno, who served as the top commander of United States forces in Afghanistan, as well as three tours in Army Ranger battalions.

What’s more, “it needs to be a Ranger qualified leader,” he adds, one with “intestinal fortitude” to ask: “What’s the ‘secret sauce’ of Ranger School? How do you not dilute that, but make sure the standards make sense?”

This argument is less about gender equity than the firm belief that women can make Ranger battalions better.

Our entire system is currently in a state of controlled demolition, where the standards of greatness are being continually torn down so that weaker beings may gain power over the strong.

And there is no bottom to this pit. Yes, theoretically, a homosexual African immigrant woman with Down’s Syndrome becoming President of the United States might seem like the bottom of the pit, but by then there will be some new group which needs propped up to make everything fair.

http://s15.postimg.org/o735o5nln/original_618x955.jpg (http://postimage.org/)
The Power Rangers (which I seriously believe is the only reason these women have it in their mind to join the Army Rangers) were invented by Jew Haim Saban.

And even if there is some theoretical bottom to this Marxist pit, we won’t hit it before the whole of society collapses around us as we are overrun by the hordes.

I have said that in the near future, everyone will be either an SJW or a Fascist, but this only applies to the White Western world. There are other systems of other races, and these systems are or will soon become stronger than our own.

http://s14.postimg.org/n3o532sr5/american_vs_isis.png (http://postimage.org/)
Who shall prove stronger?

The Asians have a racial, masculine system based on logic. The Arabs have a racial, masculine system based on religious ideology. The Latinos have a racial, masculine system, though its basis is admittedly unclear. Even the Blacks have a racial, masculine system, though it doesn’t appear to have any basis in anything beyond “muh dik.”

http://s27.postimg.org/cdllf28oj/chinese_military_prade_618x424.jpg (http://postimage.org/)
Nihao, Whitey.

http://s10.postimg.org/rb9l9p7rt/isis_soldiers_marching_685x320_618x289.jpg (http://postimage.org/)
Allah akber, Whitey

http://s9.postimg.org/dyq5udsrj/zetas1.jpg (http://postimage.org/)
Hola, Whitey

http://s12.postimg.org/v2rfkxa4d/baltimore_riot_police_car_AFP_640x480_618x464.jpg (http://postimage.org/)
Yo dawg

All of these groups are, all things being equal, superior in power to a White system run by women, homosexuals and foreigners. A system run for the express purpose of destroying itself.

The hyenas are gathering round, waiting for us to stop flailing so they can move in for the kill.

What you are witnessing is the end of Western civilization.